[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: makeinfo 4.7
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: makeinfo 4.7 |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:27:31 -0400 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:26:39 +0200
>
> > For only 3 directives that are very easy to change back to
> > back-compatible ones, I think such a requirement would be annoyingly
> > unjustified.
>
> Who would be annoyed by it?
People who don't have Texinfo 4.7 or later installed.
> IIRC, the distribution tarballs come with premade info files,
> anyway.
I thought the GNU project was about being able to modify the manual,
not only use whatever is shipped with the tarballs.
On top of that, a large number of users who aren't developers are
using the CVS code, where you must have Texinfo to produce the manual.
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, (continued)
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/26
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Karl Berry, 2006/08/26
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/30
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/28
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Karl Berry, 2006/08/29
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/29
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/30