[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: makeinfo 4.7
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: makeinfo 4.7 |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:37:30 -0400 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:30:01 +0200
>
> > I thought the GNU project was about being able to modify the manual,
> > not only use whatever is shipped with the tarballs.
>
> If you are modifying the manual, you can be expected to be using
> development tools that are not from the stone age.
If it is really necessary to ask them to upgrade, I agree. But this
is not our case. Are you saying we should ask people to upgrade for
no good reason at all?
> That is nothing an inexperienced user would do.
There's nothing in "make info" that requires any particular
experience, IMO.
> > On top of that, a large number of users who aren't developers are
> > using the CVS code, where you must have Texinfo to produce the
> > manual.
>
> Again, this is nothing an inexperienced user would do.
I think you should check your facts. It is no longer true that only
hackers use the CVS code.
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, (continued)
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/26
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Karl Berry, 2006/08/26
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/27
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/30
- Re: makeinfo 4.7, David Kastrup, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/28
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Karl Berry, 2006/08/29
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/29
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/30
Re: makeinfo 4.7, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/30