[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu] |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:52:17 -0400 |
This is what we're thinking of using instead of
buffer-chars-modified-tick. It is a smaller change and more modular;
presuming it solves the problem well enough, it is definitely
preferable for installation now.
So, what do people think of this change?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:14:22 +0200
From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------090602040009010004050308"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
autolearn=no version=3.0.4
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- --------------090602040009010004050308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sorry for procrastinating. Is the attached patch acceptable?
- --------------090602040009010004050308
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="buffer-hash.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="buffer-hash.patch"
*** buffer.c.~1.506.~ Tue Aug 15 10:01:00 2006
- --- buffer.c Sun Aug 27 11:41:52 2006
***************
*** 1148,1153 ****
- --- 1148,1187 ----
return make_number (BUF_MODIFF (buf));
}
+
+ DEFUN ("buffer-hash", Fbuffer_hash, Sbuffer_hash,
+ 0, 1, 0,
+ doc: /* Return hash code for BUFFER.
+ No argument or nil as argument means use current buffer as BUFFER. */)
+ (buffer)
+ register Lisp_Object buffer;
+ {
+ register struct buffer *buf;
+ register unsigned char *at, *to;
+ register unsigned int hash = 0;
+
+ if (NILP (buffer))
+ buf = current_buffer;
+ else
+ {
+ CHECK_BUFFER (buffer);
+ buf = XBUFFER (buffer);
+ }
+
+ at = BUF_BEG_ADDR (buf);
+ to = BUF_GPT_ADDR (buf);
+ while (at < to)
+ hash = ((((unsigned)(hash) << 4) + (((unsigned)(hash) >> 24) &
0x0fffffff))
+ + (unsigned)(*at++));
+
+ at = BUF_GAP_END_ADDR (buf);
+ to = BUF_Z_ADDR (buf);
+ while (at < to)
+ hash = ((((unsigned)(hash) << 4) + (((unsigned)(hash) >> 24) &
0x0fffffff))
+ + (unsigned)(*at++));
+
+ return make_number (hash & INTMASK);
+ }
DEFUN ("rename-buffer", Frename_buffer, Srename_buffer, 1, 2,
"sRename buffer (to new name): \nP",
***************
*** 6024,6029 ****
- --- 6058,6064 ----
defsubr (&Sbuffer_modified_p);
defsubr (&Sset_buffer_modified_p);
defsubr (&Sbuffer_modified_tick);
+ defsubr (&Sbuffer_hash);
defsubr (&Srename_buffer);
defsubr (&Sother_buffer);
defsubr (&Sbuffer_enable_undo);
*** imenu.el.~1.118.~ Tue Aug 15 10:00:50 2006
- --- imenu.el Sun Aug 27 11:32:36 2006
***************
*** 970,981 ****
"The value of (buffer-modified-tick) as of last call to
`imenu-update-menubar'.")
(make-variable-buffer-local 'imenu-menubar-modified-tick)
(defun imenu-update-menubar ()
(when (and (current-local-map)
(keymapp (lookup-key (current-local-map) [menu-bar index]))
! (not (eq (buffer-modified-tick)
! imenu-menubar-modified-tick)))
! (setq imenu-menubar-modified-tick (buffer-modified-tick))
(let ((index-alist (imenu--make-index-alist t)))
;; Don't bother updating if the index-alist has not changed
;; since the last time we did it.
- --- 970,988 ----
"The value of (buffer-modified-tick) as of last call to
`imenu-update-menubar'.")
(make-variable-buffer-local 'imenu-menubar-modified-tick)
+ (defvar imenu-buffer-hash 0
+ "The value returned by `buffer-hash' as of last call to
`imenu-update-menubar'.")
+ (make-variable-buffer-local 'imenu-buffer-hash)
+
(defun imenu-update-menubar ()
(when (and (current-local-map)
(keymapp (lookup-key (current-local-map) [menu-bar index]))
! (let ((tick (buffer-modified-tick)))
! (when (/= tick imenu-menubar-modified-tick)
! (setq imenu-menubar-modified-tick tick)))
! (let ((hash (buffer-hash)))
! (when (/= hash imenu-buffer-hash)
! (setq imenu-buffer-hash hash))))
(let ((index-alist (imenu--make-index-alist t)))
;; Don't bother updating if the index-alist has not changed
;; since the last time we did it.
- --------------090602040009010004050308--
------- End of forwarded message -------
- address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu],
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], David Kastrup, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/30