[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes ime
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu] |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:52:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> How about this? It adds jit-lock-pre-stealth-fontify-hook and
>> jit-lock-post-stealth-fontify-hook, which are normal hooks run before
>> and after each chunk of stealth fontification. Then imenu can use
>> this to avoid menu bar updates resulting from stealth fontification.
>
> This only eliminates one particular source of unwanted updates. I don't
> think this code is worth the trouble. At the very least, add it to
> font-lock rather than jit-lock.
> Better yet, introduce a macro `with-buffer-unmodified' like the one used in
> jit-lock, and make it manage a `buffer-really-modified-tick', kind of like
> the buffer-chars-modified-tick. Then use it in jit-lock/font-lock
> and friends.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
> PS: And make sure it also works when nested ;-)
I still vote for installing Martin's buffer-chars-modified-tick
... anything else seems to be "too much" or "too little" or "too slow" :-)
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], David Kastrup, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/28
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/29
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu],
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/31
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], martin rudalics, 2006/08/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/30
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], martin rudalics, 2006/08/31
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/31
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Chong Yidong, 2006/08/31
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/31
- Re: address@hidden: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/31