[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:07:08 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> On further consideration, it's impossible to handle this perfectly:
Of course! A simple way to cheat font-lock is to use "@echo
..." in Makefile.
> consider compiling a file named "foo -version-info 1", which gives
> rise to the error message
> foo -version-info 1:0: blah blah
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The question is which is important, to handle the above
extremely rare case correctly (and fail in more general
case), or to handle the more general case correctly (and
fail in rarer case).
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/06
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/10
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/10
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/11
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/15
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/15
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/16
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Juri Linkov, 2006/09/17
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/18