Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer

[Chong Yidong]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> OTOH it's still rather unusual to have " -" in a file name, so maybe
> we can use that as a telltale sign that we're not looking at a file
> name (and hence not an error message either)?

Good idea.  This seems to work, as far as I can tell.

*** emacs/lisp/progmodes/compile.el.~1.407.~    2006-09-12 12:50:21.000000000 
-0400
--- emacs/lisp/progmodes/compile.el     2006-09-13 16:15:56.000000000 -0400
***************
*** 229,235 ****
       ;; the last line tries to rule out message where the info after the
       ;; line number starts with "SS".  --Stef
       "^\\(?:[[:alpha:]][-[:alnum:].]+: ?\\)?\
! \\([0-9]*[^0-9\n].*?\\): ?\
  \\([0-9]+\\)\\(?:\\([.:]\\)\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\
  \\(?:-\\([0-9]+\\)?\\(?:\\3\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\)?:\
  \\(?: *\\(\\(?:Future\\|Runtime\\)?[Ww]arning\\|W:\\)\\|\
--- 229,235 ----
       ;; the last line tries to rule out message where the info after the
       ;; line number starts with "SS".  --Stef
       "^\\(?:[[:alpha:]][-[:alnum:].]+: ?\\)?\
! \\([0-9]*[^0-9\n]\\(?:[^\n ]\\| [^-\n]\\)*?\\): ?\
  \\([0-9]+\\)\\(?:\\([.:]\\)\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\
  \\(?:-\\([0-9]+\\)?\\(?:\\3\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?\\)?:\
  \\(?: *\\(\\(?:Future\\|Runtime\\)?[Ww]arning\\|W:\\)\\|\