[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:04:34 +0100 |
On 2/1/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <address@hidden> wrote:
Could load-file-name be a way for a user to check in user-init-file what
is actually loaded?
What do you mean? `user-init-file' is what is actually loaded.
Or is that not set here?
Where? Certainly `load-file-name' is set while a file is being loaded.
/L/e/k/t/u
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02