[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:17:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
> File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
> If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
> exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
> by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.
It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.
Stefan
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02