[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image mode
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Image mode |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:56:52 +0100 |
On 2/6/07, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
The vehemence of your statements comes across as an attack
What part, the one where I say that it would be better to rethink the
image support, or the other, where I defend against accusations of not
taking the time to consider options just because I don't agree with
them?
On a second thought, perhaps you're referring to the message (for once
short and to the point, I'd say) in which I answer to my arguments
being called strawmen (at least it wasn't a dead horse).
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Image mode, (continued)
- Re: Image mode, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Image mode, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/07
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/07
- Re: Image mode, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/07
- Re: Image mode, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Chris Moore, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Chris Moore, 2007/02/07
- Re: Image mode, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/07