[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NT icons
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: NT icons |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:00:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> lwlib/lwlib-Xaw.c
> copyright Chuck Thompson; but under GPL, so OK?
No, we would need an assignment.
> lwlib/*
> should we:
> 1) ensure all files that were originally in the "Lucid Widget
> Library" have 1992 Lucid copyright?
> 2) add or remove FSF copyrights to any files we have made non-trivial
> changes to since 1992?
We have on file in copyright.list
EMACS Lucid, Inc. 1992-07-01
Assigns changes to Emacs.
So it would seem that we have lwlib covered. Would it be relevant
with regard to the copyrights that Lucid has ceased to exist?
<URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid_Inc.>
Apparently the Lucid-Emacs related product "Energize" went to Tartan
(now a subsidiary of TI).
It is my guess that we should be fine with tracking the copyright and
ownership situation at the time we got both code and assignment. But
I certainly am no lawyer.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: NT icons, (continued)
- Re: NT icons, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/14
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/15
- Re: NT icons, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/16
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/18
- Re: NT icons,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/19
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/18
- Re: NT icons, Glenn Morris, 2007/02/19
- Re: NT icons, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/15
- Re: NT icons, Glenn Morris, 2007/02/15
- Re: NT icons, Glenn Morris, 2007/02/15
- Re: NT icons, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/17
- Re: NT icons, Glenn Morris, 2007/02/17