[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:27:16 -0500 |
Regardless of the system load: the load may be low at the moment
_exactly_ because the user terminated all processes that would disturb
the interactivity of his current work, and I think it a mistake that
Emacs considers the CPU fit for grabbing for its own purposes unless
the user _explicitly_ asked for it.
Stealth fontification is intended to stop whenever the user types a
character. So why would it interfere with the "interactivity" of
Emacs commands? Is there a bug which prevents stealth fontification
from stopping quickly?
- Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, martin rudalics, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27