[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:39:15 -0500 |
> The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving to
> another part of the file. Is fontification now sufficiently fast
> that such delays are not much of an annoyance any more?
No, we are definitely not there yet, IMO.
Would you please tell us more? What sort of machine are you using,
and how bad are these delays? We need to compare them with the delays
caused by stealth fontification.
- Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, martin rudalics, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26