[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:53:03 -0500 |
> Regardless of the system load: the load may be low at the moment
> _exactly_ because the user terminated all processes that would disturb
> the interactivity of his current work, and I think it a mistake that
> Emacs considers the CPU fit for grabbing for its own purposes unless
> the user _explicitly_ asked for it.
>
> Stealth fontification is intended to stop whenever the user types a
> character. So why would it interfere with the "interactivity" of
> Emacs commands?
Who is talking about the interactivity of Emacs?
The first paragraph cited seems to suggest that.
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, (continued)
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Romain Francoise, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Andreas Schwab, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27