[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-gtk as default?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: --with-gtk as default? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:29:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:20:03 +0100
>> Cc: address@hidden
>>
>> Cygwin is basically an X11 build?
>
> Yes.
Thanks. Of course you are right in that it does not exactly help that
Cygwin Gtk+ appears to crash.
I have no idea whether this should be considered a general
showstopper. Probably depends on how many people would consider the
platform Cygwin/Gtk+ a "natural" choice.
If it is not a showstopper, then Cygwin/Gtk+ should likely lead to a
strong warning upon configuration, and not be the default for Cygwin.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
Re: --with-gtk as default?, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28