[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-gtk as default?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: --with-gtk as default? |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:20:02 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:15:16 +0000
> From: Jason Rumney <address@hidden>
> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> Not with GTK, but I think the underlying problem is the same as we
> encountered a few months ago trying to get Emacs compiling with the
> latest version of msvc when we tried linking with the DLL version of the
> Microsoft C Library.
Yes, of course. The fact that symbol resolution is done at link time
on Windows (as opposed to runtime) is something we cannot change.
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, (continued)
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
Re: --with-gtk as default?, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Nick Roberts, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28