[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multi-tty branch created
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: multi-tty branch created |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2007 19:24:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
>> For the sake of transparent backward compatibility, I'd make --current-frame
>> the default, and use -nw as an argument to force the use of the new
>> multi-tty feature. This way you only get the new feature when you ask
>> for it. I normally prefer using an X11 frame over a tty frame, so I'd only
>> want to use -nw in those cases where it matters (typically when the
>> bandwidth is limited).
> You assume that emacsclient now opens a tty frame even if X is
> available. That's not the case. Emacsclient works like Emacs: it
> prefers X, and falls back to the tty only if X is unavailable or the
> user forces opening a tty frame by supplying "-t" (the emacsclient
> equivalent to "-nw").
> $ emacsclient
> ==> X frame
There are *many* different ways to create new frames (one per "session",
one per file, reuse old ones or not, ...). I hope you got it right ;-)
> $ emacsclient -t
> ==> tty frame
> $ emacsclient -c
> ==> no new frame
Maybe it's OK. Note that when I added the --display argument, I was
careful to not automatically use the $DISPLAY envvar, in order to preserve
backward compatibility, so users have to say --display "$DISPLAY" if they
want it.
My experience with Emacs is that when introducing a new feature, any minor
backward incompatibility will slow down adoption, so it's easier to just let
new features disabled by default. See the comment-style variable for
another example ;-)
> I agree that "-t" should be renamed "-nw"; in fact this idea is even in
> the README file. However, multi-character short options are a pain to
> implement. I'd prefer if someone with more getopt experience would do
> it instead. :-)
I see. Yes, it's a problem with the current argument scheme, indeed.
Stefan
- Re: multi-tty branch created, (continued)
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Károly Lőrentey, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, David Kastrup, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Károly Lőrentey, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, David Kastrup, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Károly Lőrentey, 2007/05/16
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/17
- Re: multi-tty branch created, rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/05/17
- Re: multi-tty branch created,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: multi-tty branch created, rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/05/18
- Re: multi-tty branch created, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/19
Re: multi-tty branch created, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/13
Re: multi-tty branch created, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/05/14