[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented.
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented. |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:26:22 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:25:01PM +0100, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 'n Tag, Tomas!
Tagchen!
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:23:35AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:19:47AM +0100, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > One definitive disadvantage of the "Lnnn Cnnn" format [...]
> > is that they are not very internatinalization-friendly
> I don't agree. I think that the "L" and the "C" aren't really understood
> as letters: they're kind of uninterpreted symbols.
Makes sense. My argument was "all other things being equal, prefer
language-agnostic constructs". But other things ain't equal. The
alternatives proposed so far all have their own disadvantages.
[...]
> That I want Emacs optimised for left-to-right European languages and
> culture. ;-) [...]
> We shouldn't try
> to find a compromise solution which would satisfy nobody.
Fair enough
Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGaRKuBcgs9XrR2kYRApqtAJ0T5g1JbPjjHWt8csT3kT0uQZ6/+QCfTG+a
BuhQkX2OPC0FILMJl5tU2BI=
=b/gs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., (continued)
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Stephen Berman, 2007/06/06
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Werner LEMBERG, 2007/06/07
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Daniel Brockman, 2007/06/10
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Juri Linkov, 2007/06/10
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Jay Belanger, 2007/06/06
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/06/08
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., tomas, 2007/06/07