[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented.
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented. |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:23:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:19:47AM +0100, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Emacs!
>
> When one of line-number-mode and column-number-mode is enabled, you see
> either "L561" or "C2" in the mode line. When both are enabled, you see
> instead "(561,2)". This isn't documented in the Emacs manual page
> "Optional Mode Line".
One definitive disadvantage of the "Lnnn Cnnn" format (and of the
separate "Lnnn" or "Cnnn" formats in use now) is that they are not very
internatinalization-friendly: they'll work only in English and some
Latin-based languages.
Of course, Emacs isn't i18n-ready, by a far stretch, but if we want to
have that some day, maybe now is the time to consider such things when
designing new features -- wdyt?
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGZ8CHBcgs9XrR2kYRAiOUAJ9dGAAOvPqEVYkihuBItMdQESVjOwCeORxh
r+ZvymMbs0Um5sfHJBSeleo=
=Ah+l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., (continued)
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Dieter Wilhelm, 2007/06/08
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Nick Roberts, 2007/06/08
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Stephen Berman, 2007/06/06
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Werner LEMBERG, 2007/06/07
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Daniel Brockman, 2007/06/10
- Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Juri Linkov, 2007/06/10
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Jay Belanger, 2007/06/06
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented., Alan Mackenzie, 2007/06/08
Re: display.texi: (<line>,<col>) isn't documented.,
tomas <=