[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:04:22 +1200 |
> Yes, I got the same impression. Someone argued that firefox/mozilla by that
> standard is not well integrated either. I often use ghostview, xpdf, xdvi,
> and they are even less integrated than Emacs. But very useful nontheless
> and the lack of "integration" hasn't been anything I ever thought about.
>
> Some things may be worth adressing, but I think mostly this is the same "If
> it isn't Gnome, it sucks"-attitude that Gnome people seem to have.
There certainly was a line of thought that suggested the application had to fit
the requirements of the desktop, rather than the desktop accommodating the
application. I guess it shouldn't be ignored, but it does seem to be a case
of the tail wagging the dog.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David House, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Jason Rumney, 2007/06/08