[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:54:16 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:17:28 +0200
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > FWIW, I don't think we should merge changes that are safe until
> > some time has passed and we have some kind of idea about how
> > buggy v22.1 is. If the number of problems we hear on
> > bug-gnu-emacs is large, then we should stabilize 22.x before we
> > merge changes that can potentially destabilize it.
> >
> > We need to see, first of all, how many problems are reported in
> > 22.1.
>
> Why do we need to see that? Problems in 22.1 will be of two kinds:
>
> a) Problems that have a better fix or solution in Emacs 23
> b) Problems that have the same fix or solution in Emacs 23
In case it wasn't clear, _I_ was talking about merging changes to the
EMACS_22_BASE branch, not to the trunk.
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/04
Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/06
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07