[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:22:37 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Anyway, the main point was that you claimed people don't use
> copy-sequence on process-environment, and I found _quite_ a few hits
> for that, "syntactically identical".
Well there are always a few weirdos out there ... :-)
-Miles
--
We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
-Oscar Wilde
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14