[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: highlight failed part of isearch input
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: highlight failed part of isearch input |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:22:56 -0700 |
> >> (when (string-match " +$" m)
> >> (propertize (substring m (match-beginning 0)) 'face
> >> 'trailing-whitespace))
> >>
> >> This is a no-op. But maybe it is good to remove this code because the
> >> failed trailing whitespace is highlighted in the new face
> >> isearch-failed. We could change its background to more strong color,
> >> e.g. to something like is used in Firefox failed search, so failed
> >> space will be more visible.
> >
> > Good catch. We need to change the face of the pertinent part of
> > `m' itself, not just a copy. Thx. The face to use for that is
> > `trailing-whitespace', no?
>
> Why use `trailing-whitespace' when `isearch-fail' face makes failed
> trailing whitespace visible as well?
I thought RMS decided he wanted two different faces. That's the only reason
I'm aware of.
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, (continued)
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/07/10
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/10
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/10
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2007/07/22
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/23
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2007/07/23
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2007/07/23
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Juri Linkov, 2007/07/23
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/24
- Re: highlight failed part of isearch input, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/24
- RE: highlight failed part of isearch input, Drew Adams, 2007/07/24