[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:32:28 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
> the input methods german-postfix and german-alt-postfix are completely
> identical, AFAICS.
> I think it's confusing. I'd suggest to either remove
> german-alt-postfix (keep it as comment it in leim/quail/latin-alt.el?)
> or add "identical to german-postfix" in the documentation of
> german-alt-postfix.
> BTW, my impression is that `latin-alt.el' was derived from
> `latin-post.el' and modifications to most languages (input methods)
> were changed, but german wasn't. Is this historically correct? Just
> curious...
I've found many other input methods (e.g. danish-postfix vs
danish-alt-postfix) are the same.
They have been there since latin-atl.el was committed by
Richard about 10 years ago. I have no idea why the same
maps were introduced in that file.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden