[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:52:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, Dec 10 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>>> BTW, my impression is that `latin-alt.el' was derived from
>>> `latin-post.el' and modifications to most languages (input methods)
>>> were changed, but german wasn't. Is this historically correct? Just
>>> curious...
>>
>> I've found many other input methods (e.g. danish-postfix vs
>> danish-alt-postfix) are the same.
[Also `swedish-alt-postfix' and `swedish-postfix' as pointed out by Mathias.]
> None of these input methods use the problematic characters as postfix.
Why is »"« more problematic than other postfix characters (e.g. »'«)?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/