[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commit practices
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Commit practices |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:57 -0500 |
The reason I have asked people not to commit multiple files
is that they bloat the log entries of each file, making them
essentially unusable.
I did it this way for a reason. Someday we are going to want to
migrate the CVS tree to a VCS that has real changesets. We're almost
certainly going to do it with a tool functionally like cvs2svn that
tries to reconstruct commit groups using date, the content of the
comments, and possibly this Commit-ID thing I see in the CVS logs. It
will be helpful, when we do that, if there as many similarities across
related commits as possible for the migration tool to grab onto.
In effect, the suggestion here is that we abandon the idea
of useful readable info associated by the VCS with each file.
That would mean that the ChangeLog file is the only place
for such info.
I won't say "absolutely not".
- Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Commit practices, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Karl Fogel, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, David Kastrup, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Miles Bader, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Miles Bader, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30