[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commit practices
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Commit practices |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:44:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:
> In effect, the suggestion here is that we abandon the idea
> of useful readable info associated by the VCS with each file.
Right. Information about changes is most useful when it has *changeset*
granularity, not file granularity.
> That would mean that the ChangeLog file is the only place
> for such info.
No, it means that the information now in the Changelog belongs in the
CVS history, but with per-commit granularity rather than per-file granularity.
> I won't say "absolutely not".
Good. I'm preparing a post with a major proposal about this.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/12/29
- Re: Commit practices, Karl Fogel, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Commit practices, David Kastrup, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Miles Bader, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Miles Bader, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Miles Bader, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, David Kastrup, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, David Kastrup, 2007/12/30
- Re: Commit practices, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/30