[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:29:47 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> To start using git, we need first get to the point the Linux kernel
> developers are at: lots of developers independently developing all
> kinds of extensions. _And_ we need a head maintainer who works on
> nothing else but integration of features she likes into the product
> that is eventually released.
No we don't (how on earth did you reach that conclusion ?!).
Git, like most modern source control systems, is pretty much a
_superset_ of CVS, and can happily be used with a CVS-like "central
server" (where it still handily beats the pants of CVS in almost every
respect).
-Miles
--
Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/01
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Tassilo Horn, 2008/01/02
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason, 2008/01/04
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/04
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, tomas, 2008/01/02
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/03