[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:36:41 +0100 |
On Jan 20, 2008 6:10 AM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> cygwin seems like a fine solution for supporting developers on windows.
I doubt Cygwin can be "a fine solution" for anything, but that's just me.
However, as someone already said, there's MSYS/MinGW port of git in
the works. It lacks some things (Subversion importing, daemon, most
things related to e-mail...), but it is quite useable.
That's not to say that git it is preferable over mercurial, however.
Let's first read Eric's article.
Juanma
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Jari Aalto, 2008/01/19
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, dhruva, 2008/01/19
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Miles Bader, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Karl Fogel, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Miles Bader, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/20
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Miles Bader, 2008/01/20