[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linum.el?
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: linum.el? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:50:21 +0100 |
On Dec 27, 2007 7:24 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> FWIW, I still firmly believe that we should include linum.el now, as
> it works quite well, and worry later about optimizations and such.
>
> I won't object.
I'll commit linum.el (version 0.9wx) in the trunk in a few days, if no
one objects.
Juanma
- Re: linum.el?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/01
- Re: linum.el?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30