[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linum.el?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: linum.el? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:00:35 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> It's not out of the question to add a modular new feature to Emacs
> 22.2. If it can't break anything else, it isn't risky.
I've found that even "modular" new features can be pretty annoying in
merging to the trunk -- even if they start out the same on both the
trunk and branch, many files seem to nevertheless generate a lot of
merge conflicts. Often this is because people make the same change in
different ways on the trunk and on the branch (for instance, due to a
certain function being usable on the trunk but not on the branch).
New features seem to be a bigger problem in this regard than the
majority of the code-base, probably because they tend to get more
development.
-Miles
--
Bacchus, n. A convenient deity invented by the ancients as an excuse for
getting drunk.
- Re: linum.el?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/01
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/20
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/31
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/31