[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: linum.el?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: linum.el? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:33:31 +0100 |
On Jan 30, 2008 11:13 PM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't ask that the release be compromised to make my life easier --
> but I also don't think it be a bad thing to pay a bit more heed to the
> idea that the release branch is mainly for bug fixes and important
> feature updates.
I agree with you. The trouble is, with Emacs releases so infrequent,
people often feels compelled to include new features in the release
branch because otherwise they could take years to appear in a released
Emacs. I know that's the reason I suggested including linum.el in the
branch.
Juanma
- Re: linum.el?, (continued)
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/29
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/30
- Re: linum.el?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: linum.el?, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/31
- Re: linum.el?, Miles Bader, 2008/01/31