[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes
From: |
Trent W. Buck |
Subject: |
Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:34:32 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:31:32PM +0100, Michael Albinus wrote:
>> I'm also not sure that middling to complicated proxying
>> arrangements can even be set up with the current
>> tramp-default-proxies-alist. For example, suppose a host allows
>> ssh from anywhere, but locks down its internal staff-only FTP
>> upload area to sites on the corporate subnet? You'd need to have
>> the /ftp:appdev:/incoming use an /ssh:gw: proxy, but /ssh:appdev:
>> should not use any proxy (although it would still work with one,
>> it would just waste gw's bandwidth).
>
> I'd recommend to use 2 Emacs profiles, with different settings of
> tramp-default-proxies-alist. I do something similar in .gnus:
>
> (if (my-ping "mail.work.de")
> (setq send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it
> smtpmail-default-smtp-server "mail.work.de"
> smtpmail-local-domain "work.de")
> (setq send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it
> smtpmail-default-smtp-server "mail.home.de"
> smtpmail-local-domain "home.de"))
I think I haven't been clear. In the example above, it's desirable to
dispatch on method as well as hostname and userename.
- Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Trent W. Buck, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Trent W. Buck, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/28
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Trent W. Buck, 2008/01/28
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/28
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes,
Trent W. Buck <=
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/31
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/31
- Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/31
Re: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes, Michael Albinus, 2008/01/27
Shell-command is no longer a shell (was: Tramp 2.0 -> 2.1 migration woes), Michael Albinus, 2008/01/28