[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Obsolete functions and variables
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Obsolete functions and variables |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:02:36 +1200 |
> I guess the dangers generally outweigh the advantages but there's not
> much point in marking them obsolete if they're never going to be
> removed.
>
> I think that is incorrect. It is useful to urge people to make their
> code use more modern interfaces regardless of whether we ever delete
> the old ones.
In that case, perhaps the macros should have been called
define-deprecated-variable-alias and define-deprecated-function-alias. The
word obsolete has a pretty clear meaning and is misleading when used in this
way.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, (continued)
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Mike Mattie, 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Mike Mattie, 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/10
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/11
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Richard Stallman, 2008/04/11
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Sebastian Rose, 2008/04/11
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/12
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/12
- Re: Obsolete functions and variables, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/12