[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:12:01 -0400 |
> No, I expect that router does not count. I'd expect users don't
> install software at all in that, so it might as well be a circuit, and
> we don't need to ask whether there is actually software inside it.
>
> You are arguing against a straw man that didn't come from me.
So we are not forced to give a copy of the source code which is used inside
the GNU/Linux based routers and bridges network appliances we rent to our
customers?
That's a different question entirely, which is not what
I was talking about. By criticizing something nobody said,
you are only sabotaging the discussion.
Yes, you are right. Those are all good reasons to protest
against Apple.
But none of these are particularly egregious examples of
âevilâ
DRM is always evil.
â particularly since Apple has a history of going
out of its way to make the restrictions it imposes as light as
possible for its customers â
It's not true, but even if it were, it would not signify. Apple
entered voluntarily into a deal with record companies to implement
DRM, and it shares in the profits from that deal, so it also shares
in the culpability.
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/02
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/03
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/04
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/04
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/05
Re: Release plans, Davi Leal, 2008/08/01
- Re: Release plans,
Richard M Stallman <=
Re: Release plans, Jay Belanger, 2008/08/01
Re: Release plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/02