Re: Release plans

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

A Soare wrote:
> > > I told you: everything depends of education.
> >  > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better.
> > > But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other editors are 
> > > better.
> >  > I tolerate their education.
> >
> > But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? That 
> > you have learned something that they have not (yet)?
>
> The word good-best-better is a kind of recursion in nature.

Ok, it looked to me that you were trying to say that developing Emacs on 
windows was useless because of your view. That would be a very 
egocentric argument and not useful for conclusions about what to do.

You have probably explained why it is not useful in a way that I have 
missed.

> If you take care about this definition, the loop dissapears. It reduces to 
> discrimination. If you go on with further this discussion, you make 
> discrimination. Everything is relative to this world. A fish cannot say that he 
> leaves better than a man, and vice versa.
> You did not understand. The web site where I have my pretty and most lovely 
> mail account add this banner.

Maybe, but what i wanted to say was that you mail program does not work 
ok. So perhaps it would be best if you used some other mail program.