[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3 |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:26:07 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:33:01 +0200
> From: "Lennart Borgman" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "David De La Harpe Golden" <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> (defun test-insert-emacs-lisp-dir ()
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil))
> (message "======================= After cache warm up")
> (message "Timing insert-file-contents-literally:")
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t))
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t))
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" t))
> (message "Timing insert-file-contents:")
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil))
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil))
> (benchmark 1 '(test-insert-dir "c:/emacs/u/070103/emacs/lisp/" nil))
> (message "Ready"))
>
> The output was
>
> ======================= After cache warm up
> Timing insert-file-contents-literally:
> Elapsed time: 5.531000s (0.094000s in 1 GCs)
> Elapsed time: 5.594000s
> Elapsed time: 5.828000s (0.093000s in 1 GCs)
> Timing insert-file-contents:
> Elapsed time: 9.484000s (0.188000s in 2 GCs)
> Elapsed time: 8.922000s (0.188000s in 2 GCs)
> Elapsed time: 8.953000s (0.203000s in 2 GCs)
Thanks.
However, without comparison with Emacs 22, it's hard to interpret
those numbers.
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, (continued)
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/22
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/22
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/22
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Lennart Borgman, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Lennart Borgman, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Lennart Borgman, 2008/10/23
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Lennart Borgman, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/10/24
- Re: Emacs 23.0 is much slower starting than Emacs 22.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/24