[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:01:46 -0700 (PDT) |
When opening any version controlled file that is under one of the more
modern VCs, SCCS is tried first.
Given that it's not a popular system, this is pure overhead, so it would
be better move it at the end of vc-handled-backends.
Any objection to this change:
--- vc-hooks.el 23 Jun 2009 06:35:43 -0000 1.278
+++ vc-hooks.el 23 Jun 2009 06:39:31 -0000
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ interpreted as hostnames."
:type 'regexp
:group 'vc)
-(defcustom vc-handled-backends '(RCS CVS SVN SCCS Bzr Git Hg Mtn Arch)
+(defcustom vc-handled-backends '(RCS CVS SVN Bzr Git Hg Mtn SCCS Arch)
;; RCS, CVS, SVN and SCCS come first because they are per-dir
;; rather than per-tree. RCS comes first because of the multibackend
;; support intended to use RCS for local commits (with a remote CVS server).
- moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Rob Weir, 2009/06/23
- moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Chong Yidong, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Jason Rumney, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, tomas, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/24