[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:31:47 +0900 |
Dan Nicolaescu writes:
>
> When opening any version controlled file that is under one of the more
> modern VCs, SCCS is tried first.
> Given that it's not a popular system, this is pure overhead,
> so it would be better move it at the end of vc-handled-backends.
> Any objection to this change:
Yes. This change is backward incompatible and buggy; the rationale
for SCCS being in the "early" group still holds as far as I know,
unless SCCS has improved its support for whole-tree commits recently.
Just deprecate it entirely, by removing it from the list. Maybe
document that 'SCCS is an allowed element, and it should come early if
it's used.
- moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Rob Weir, 2009/06/23
- moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Chong Yidong, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/23
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Jason Rumney, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, tomas, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/06/24
- Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/06/24
Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/24