[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or e
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or eshell? |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:57:00 -0800 (PST) |
Rocky Bernstein <address@hidden> writes:
> I have started to rewrite gud from the ground up.
Another thing you might want to consider in the design is to allow
debugger interaction with simple key bindings from file buffers.
Now to send commands to the debugger you'd have to use the *gud* buffer,
or use complicated key bindings.
Compare to how `edebug' works, the buffer is made read-only, and simple
bindings like: n c d can be used.
- Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or eshell?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=