[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or e
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or eshell? |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:49:53 +1300 |
> Another thing you might want to consider in the design is to allow
> debugger interaction with simple key bindings from file buffers.
>
> Now to send commands to the debugger you'd have to use the *gud* buffer,
> or use complicated key bindings.
> Compare to how `edebug' works, the buffer is made read-only, and simple
> bindings like: n c d can be used.
This is not such a good idea. The user migh actuallyt want to edit his source
code during a debug session.
--
Nick http://users.snap.net.nz/~nickrob