[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:37:53 -0800 (PST) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:12:05 -0800 (PST)
> > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Emacs-Devel <address@hidden>
> >
> > lisp.h is not consistenly listed as a dependency in Makefile (not sure
why).
>
> Richard used to be opposed to that, to avoid recompiling everything
> whenever some small part or even comment in lisp.h changes. Not sure
> if this is still a valid concern, what with today's compilation speed.
>
> > So it's probably Stefan's lisp.h change that probably tripped you...
>
> I always manually delete all *.o files when there's a significant
> change in lisp.h.
Tools are much more reliable than humans, compilation speed for emacs is
not a big concern anymore, so IMHO lisp.h should be added as a
dependency.
- dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/10
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan D., 2009/11/10
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/10
- Gcc-generated dependencise. (Was: Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c), Jan Djärv, 2009/11/14
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/10