[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:15:08 -0800 (PST) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> > Tools are much more reliable than humans, compilation speed for emacs is
> > not a big concern anymore, so IMHO lisp.h should be added as a
> > dependency.
>
> Fine by me,
If nobody beats me to it (but hopefully somebody will), I'll do it after
I clear my current patch backlog (63 files changed...)
> Stefan "who uses a `make depend' scheme and hence gets those
> extra dependencies anyway"
That's TRTD, but ...
Will Stefan's "magic tree that implements all kinds of interesting
stuff" appear in BZR once we make the switch?
- dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/09
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/10
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Jan D., 2009/11/10
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/10
- Gcc-generated dependencise. (Was: Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c), Jan Djärv, 2009/11/14
- Re: dump (temacs) fails, core in alloc.c, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/10