[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New interactive spec
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: New interactive spec |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:44:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>>> I've recently modified the behavior of switch-to-buffer in XEmacs so
>>> that the completion mechanism doesn't include the current buffer. In
>>> doing so, I figured it would be generally useful to have an
>>> interactive spec for that (meaning "a buffer except the current
>>> one"). I was thinking g/G because that's the next thing available to
>>> us, but I'm wondering if GNU Emacs already uses it, or if you'd have
>>> another suggestion.
>
>> "G" is already taken, but "g" would be free.
>
>> G -- Possibly nonexistent file name, defaulting to just directory
>> name.
>
> How important is it to have a letter for it?
I see a tendency in the opposite direction - replacing letters
with equivalent Lisp code to be able to add more functionality.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- New interactive spec, Didier Verna, 2009/11/09
- Re: New interactive spec, Tassilo Horn, 2009/11/09
- Re: New interactive spec, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/09
- Re: New interactive spec,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: New interactive spec, Didier Verna, 2009/11/10
- Re: New interactive spec, Miles Bader, 2009/11/10
- Re: New interactive spec, Didier Verna, 2009/11/11
- Re: New interactive spec, Per Starbäck, 2009/11/13
- Re: New interactive spec, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/15