|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
Date: | Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:55:31 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes: >> I am skeptical that we have everything in place that is required to >> properly support > >> (unintern nil) >> (unintern t) > >> We should make them give errors -- that's much easier than >> making them "work". There's no reason they should be allowed. > > Rather I think there's no reason to spend any time either making them > work or making them signal an error. Well, you claimed that uninterning them was a concern for having the obarray links end in pure memory. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |