[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions)
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:06:26 -0800 |
> The following patch binds <backtab> to `minibuffer-complete-backward'
I wish you wouldn't do that - just a wish. <backtab> is essentially S-TAB. I
would prefer that Emacs leave TAB combinations alone, so that users and
libraries can make use of them without stepping on standard bindings.
FWIW, C-v and M-v make more sense (yes, in the minibuffer too) for scrolling
completions than do TAB and <backtab>.
- completions - remove window after use?, David Reitter, 2009/11/11
- Re: completions - remove window after use?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/11
- Re: completions - remove window after use?, Štěpán Němec, 2009/11/11
- Re: completions - remove window after use?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/11
- Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/12
- Re: Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/12
- Re: Vertical completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/17
- Re: Vertical completions, martin rudalics, 2009/11/18
- Re: Vertical completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18
- Backward completions (was: Vertical completions), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18
- RE: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions),
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions), Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/18
- Re: Backward completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/18
- Re: Backward completions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/18
- Re: Backward completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/19
- Re: Backward completions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/19
- RE: Backward completions, Drew Adams, 2009/11/19
- Re: Backward completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/20
- Re: Backward completions, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/20
- Re: Backward completions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/20
- RE: Backward completions, Drew Adams, 2009/11/20