Glenn Morris writes:
> While reading the conditions on that page, a first glance at the bzr
> 2.0.2 source shows: it is distributed under GPLv2+ rather than v3+,
> http://www.gnu.org/software/bzr does not exist, it does not have
> texinfo documentation, it contains numerous references to the "Linux"
> operating system, and there doesn't seem to be any reference in the
> --version output or man-page to it being a GNU project.
Nope, and Canonical management is pushing in the direction of
emphasizing that it's a *Canonical product*: eg, all of the URLs are
moving from "bazaar-vcs.org" to "bazaar.canonical.com". They got some
pushback from the peanut gallery, but no committers seem to have a
problem with that.