[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:01:39 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> > Perhaps we should consider moving SKK-JISYO.L (and the other
>>> > big files) to `admin' directory which is not included in the tarball.
>>> It sounds like a good idea, smaller tar ball saves bandwith.
> > I'll do that after 23.2.
> If we do that, we need to replace the file by a URL in the tarball (so
> the file in `admin' is just a cache).
?? I don't understand exactly what you mean.
> I think it's important to try and preserve the property that the tarball
> contains all the *source* files. There are currently some files missing
> there, admittedly, but I'm not completely happy about it.
What do you mean by "*source*" here? Currently
leim/ja-dic/ja-dic.el is generated from SKK-JISYO.L manually
(i.e. by running M-x skkdic-convert) and then committed as
the source of ja-dic.elc. And ja-dic.elc is automatically
created from ja-dic.el by Makefile. So, in some senece,
ja-dic.el is the source, and SKK-JISYO.L is an external
information we use to make ja-dic.el.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Ivan Kanis, 2010/02/12
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/12
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Kenichi Handa, 2010/02/12
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Ivan Kanis, 2010/02/13
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Kenichi Handa, 2010/02/16
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/16
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/16
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Kenichi Handa, 2010/02/17
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/17
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Kenichi Handa, 2010/02/17
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/17
- Re: ja-dic.el and SKK-JYSYO.L, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/17