[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
|
From: |
Leo |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:11 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On 2010-02-25 15:26 +0000, David Reitter wrote:
> The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30
> MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're
> talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository
> (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when
> checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.)
And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again.
Leo
- emacs-w3m?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Leo <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, bob, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26