Re: emacs-w3m?

[Richard Stallman]

    > The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30
    > MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're
    > talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository
    > (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when
    > checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.)

    And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again.

Would someone please discuss this with the BZR developers?
That's the way to make useful progress happen.