[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:43:32 +0900 |
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> This is about basic VC usage here. The QuickStart is not intended to
> teach the basic rules of a VC system (nor the BzrForEmacsDevs document
> intends that, I think)
Unfortunately, this much seems to be needed.
> This was about teaching Emacs hackers with a long CVS experience
> how to switch to Bazaar.
As Eli points out, CVS reflexes will be wrong with Bazaar because
Bazaar tries very hard to DWIM.
> I'm sure that doing a blind commit was deemed as an unaceptable
> practice on the CVS days too, and the checks are similar
> (`diff').
I'll bet you're wrong; likely C-x C-s C-x v v is burned into the tips
of a lot of fingers around here. Remember, that's one reason why
QuickStart got written, so that people could have a vc.el-compatible
workflow.
> This looks confusing to me:
Thanks for the review. You're right, so I've fixed these.
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/02/26